Like all good researchers, Kester started with a simple question, which was, 'Why have so many artists over the past decade and a half been drawn to collaborative or collective modes of production?' Secondary questions soon emerged. 'What forms of knowledge do collaborative, participatory and socially engaged practices generate?' And, adding complexity and depth, 'How do we determine which transgressions matter in the arts?' Kester takes us on a journey from performance photographers in Myanmar to project housing in Alabama, and along the way details, through methodology more often associated with the social sciences, how artists blend creativity with a sense of social conscience and still manage somehow to keep it visual. - Peter Hill, Times Higher Education Supplement
Kester is a seasoned art critic with a long track record of insightful writing on the shift from public art and identity politics in the 1980s and '90s to the new phenomenon of community art in the '90s and 2000s. . . . Kester, the consummate pedagogue, shows us ideology at work by comparing different kinds of art. - Marc James Leger, Afterimage
Tackling some of the most hotly debated subjects in art and criticism today, The One and the Many represents a decisive intervention into what we can expect to be a much longer discussion about the nature of collaboration in contemporary art.
- Sarah E.K. Smith, Reviews in Cultural Theory
The One and the Many . . . offers in-depth discussion of individual artists in relation to his vision of reparative collaboration,and attacks some of the cherished verities of current critical theory. - Eleanor Heartney, Art in America
By pointing out that many contemporary artists' practices already exist quite comfortably as political activism, or urban planning, or community education Kester enables the discussion to shift from why something is art to what is at stake. The book also provides a thorough and rich description of a variety of projects. . . . - Amber Landgraff, C Magazine
Proposing nothing less than a paradigm shift in the definition of the aesthetic, Kester argues for a move beyond evaluations of visual or textual signification to considerations of the often-unforseen effects of collective interaction. . . . [T]here is a productive tension between the modest, local practices Kester focuses on and the ambitious scope of his argument. - Sami Siegelbaum, Art Journal
The One and the Many is brilliant, innovative, and brave, offering important insight on the intersection of art and politics. It complements the growing research into situational, collaborative, 'global' art projects but offers something new and stimulating by considering these works in relation to a loosely Marxian understanding of labor relations and through close readings of how they actually function over time. It develops new ways of thinking that should have a huge impact on debates in the field.-Amelia Jones, author of Self/Image: Technology, Representation, and the Contemporary Subject
In this comprehensive study, Grant H. Kester reminds us that the role of the avant-garde is always to question the nature of art's identity and that that identity is also always in-process. Within this evolving continuum, many contemporary artists now define their work collaboratively. The One and the Many examines this phenomenon, providing the necessary philosophical, theoretical, and historical depth to position such practice as the essential art 'work' of the twenty-first century.-Carol Becker, author of Thinking in Place: Art, Action, and Cultural Production
The One and the Many . . . offers in-depth discussion of individual artists in relation to his vision of reparative collaboration,and attacks some of the cherished verities of current critical theory. -- Eleanor Heartney * Art in America *
By pointing out that many contemporary artists' practices already exist quite comfortably as political activism, or urban planning, or community education Kester enables the discussion to shift from why something is art to what is at stake. The book also provides a thorough and rich description of a variety of projects. . . . -- Amber Landgraff * C Magazine *
Kester is a seasoned art critic with a long track record of insightful writing on the shift from public art and identity politics in the 1980s and '90s to the new phenomenon of community art in the '90s and 2000s. . . . Kester, the consummate pedagogue, shows us ideology at work by comparing different kinds of art. -- Marc James Leger * Afterimage *
Like all good researchers, Kester started with a simple question, which was, 'Why have so many artists over the past decade and a half been drawn to collaborative or collective modes of production?' Secondary questions soon emerged. 'What forms of knowledge do collaborative, participatory and socially engaged practices generate?' And, adding complexity and depth, 'How do we determine which transgressions matter in the arts?' Kester takes us on a journey from performance photographers in Myanmar to project housing in Alabama, and along the way details, through methodology more often associated with the social sciences, how artists blend creativity with a sense of social conscience and still manage somehow to keep it visual. -- Peter Hill * Times Higher Education *
Proposing nothing less than a paradigm shift in the definition of the aesthetic, Kester argues for a move beyond evaluations of visual or textual signification to considerations of the often-unforseen effects of collective interaction. . . . [T]here is a productive tension between the modest, local practices Kester focuses on and the ambitious scope of his argument. -- Sami Siegelbaum * Art Journal *
Tackling some of the most hotly debated subjects in art and criticism today, The One and the Many represents a decisive intervention into what we can expect to be a much longer discussion about the nature of collaboration in contemporary art.
-- Sarah E.K. Smith * Reviews in Cultural Theory *
